مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | نقش مجاورت شهروندان محلی و جهانی در شناخت اخلاقی سهامداران از مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | The role of proximity to local and global citizens in stakeholders’ moral recognition of corporate social responsibility |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۱۱ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
۲٫۵۰۹ در سال ۲۰۱۷ |
شاخص H_index | ۱۴۴ در سال ۲۰۱۸ |
شاخص SJR | ۱٫۲۶ در سال ۲۰۱۸ |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت، اقتصاد |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت استراتژیک، مدیریت کسب و کار |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله تحقیقات تجاری – Journal of Business Research |
دانشگاه | Rennes School of Business – rue Robert d’Arbrissel – France |
کلمات کلیدی | تصمیم گیری اخلاقی، مجاورت، هویت ملی، هویت جهانی، نیرووی اخلاقی، مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت های بین المللی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Ethical decision-making, Proximity, National identity, Global identity, Moral intensity, International corporate social responsibility |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.027 |
کد محصول | E10286 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Highlights Abstract Keywords ۱ Introduction ۲ Theoretical framework ۳ Hypotheses ۴ Methodology ۵ Results ۶ Discussion and conclusions ۷ Limitations and directions for future research Appendix A. References Vitae |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to explore the effects of social proximity (defined by national and global identities) and geographic proximity (one’s own nation or foreign nations) on the moral recognition of corporate social responsibility (CSR). To achieve this objective we draw upon moral decision-making and social identity theory. We test our hypotheses using a homogeneous (in terms of age and education) sample from China and France (Study 1, N = 369) and replicate the study with a demographically heterogeneous sample from the United Kingdom (Study 2, N = 207). The results suggest that (1) national and global identities positively affect citizens’ moral recognition of CSR; and (2) global identity offsets the negative effect of geographic distance on moral recognition of CSR. These results indicate that global identity makes individuals care more about CSR abroad than they would without this identity. Introduction Individuals’ responses to different corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives are frequently attributed to the perceived personal benefit of the actions (Becker-Olsen, Cudmore, & Hill, 2006; Bhattacharya & Sen, 2003; Du, Bhattacharya, & Sen, 2010). Within this stream of research work, the effectiveness of CSR strategies tends to be evaluated from the perspective of reciprocity suggesting that stakeholders will support companies who engage in actions that directly or indirectly contribute to the stakeholders’ own well-being (Bhattacharya & Sen, 2003; Jones, Willness, & Madey, 2014; Vitell, 2015). In comparison, studies of sustainable citizenship argue that individuals may take a citizenship perspective to their behavior as consumers, employees, or investors and value CSR for its benefits to others (Crane, Matten, & Moon, 2004; Shah et al., 2012). For example, driven by their sense of responsibility as local citizens, stakeholders may consider the welfare of their own country in their consumer behavior (Balabanis, Diamantopoulos, Mueller, & Melewar, 2001; Shankarmahesh, 2006), or, as global citizens, they may take into account global social and environmental welfare (Castaldo, Perrini, Misani, & Tencati, 2009; Grinstein & Riefler, 2015; Shah et al., 2012). These insights highlight the importance of the citizenship role in supporting stakeholders’ appreciation of organizational actions that benefit other groups. This work also points to potential spatial differences in the citizens’ perspective on CSR where the groups of concern are local or global citizens (Shah et al., 2012). However, empirical research on this matter is scant and relies on untested assumptions such as the notion that greater geographic proximity to a group will increase moral concern for the implications of one’s actions on that group (Carlson, Kacmar, & Wadsworth, 2009; Jones, 1991; Mencl & May, 2009). The study of the citizens’ concern for people impacted by CSR actions is increasingly important in the current context of political calls for greater corporate responsibility to national, rather than global, social welfare (BBC, 11 January, 2017). The role of proximity to local and global beneficiaries in shaping the level of citizens’ recognition of corporate responsibility is of strategic importance for companies operating across multiple countries, where the notion of CSR has both a local and an international dimension. |