مشخصات مقاله | |
عنوان مقاله | Identifying moderators of brand attachment for driving customer purchase intention of original vs c ounterfeits of luxury brands |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | شناسایی مدیران وابسته به نام تجاری برای تحریک تمایل خرید مشتری به کالاهای اصلی و تقلبی مارک های لوکس |
فرمت مقاله | |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
نوع نگارش مقاله | مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) – مقاله مفهومی |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
سال انتشار | |
تعداد صفحات مقاله | 13 صفحه |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | بازاریابی، مدیریت کسب و کار MBA |
مجله | |
دانشگاه | دانشگاه مدیریت مطالعات کاربردی Mannheim، آلمان |
کلمات کلیدی | پیوست نام تجاری، تقلبی، محصولات لوکس، اقتصادهای نوظهور، خودپنداره |
کد محصول | E4247 |
نشریه | نشریه الزویر |
لینک مقاله در سایت مرجع | لینک این مقاله در سایت الزویر (ساینس دایرکت) Sciencedirect – Elsevier |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
1. Introduction
The luxury industry has a significant share in the global market of luxury brands growing from about 90 million consumers in 1995 up to 330 million in 2013 (Bain e Company, 2013). Brazil represents an attractive market for luxury entrepreneurs, capturing investments of US$ 2 billion a year Modesto (2007) notwithstanding the national culture of Brazil thwarting entrepreneurial behaviour (Woodside, Bernal, & Conduras, 2015). Brazil is the eighth country in the world considering losses in tax revenues amounting to US $ 15 billion each year (Havocscope, 2016). A significant challenge for luxury brands remains the growing number of companies that are counterfeiting and creating a parallel or shadow market (Kapferer & Michaut, 2014). Yoo and Lee (2005) define counterfeiting as the practice of manufacturing or selling products using a brand owner’s trademark without the permission or the trademark owner’s oversight. Usually, these goods are cheaper and inferior in quality. While counterfeits may stimulate demand in an economy (Givon, Mahajan, & Muller, 1995) and provide social status and symbolism at a fraction of the original cost (Nia & Zaichowsky, 2000), counterfeit products mislead consumers by making them believe that they are an original brand (Kim, Cho, & Johnson, 2009). Hence, counterfeit products bring serious economic losses for the original luxury brands. While the growth of luxury markets is caused by emerging countries (Kapferer & Michaut, 2014), most of the research about counterfeiting was carried out in developed economies (Eisend & Schuchert-Guler, 2006; Staake, Thiesse, & Fleisch, 2009). According to OECD (2007) studies, counterfeiting differs among countries due to a series of factors (e.g. how local government deal and combat piracy). Sheth (2011) outlines five characteristics of emerging markets (heterogeneity, sociopolitical governance, chronic shortage of resources, unbranded competition and inadequate infrastructure) that are fundamentally different from the traditional industrialized economies. Yet, the speed of transformation has been somewhat too high for the enforcement agencies and many countries are now emerging as both large producers and consumers of fakes with counterfeiting being also considered a source of income for the population and a form of transference of technology (Staake et al., 2009). |