مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | تأثیر شیوه های مدیریت ریسک استراتژیک و عملیاتی بر عملکرد شرکت: یک تحقیق تجربی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2020 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 47 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
4.041 در سال 2019 |
شاخص H_index | 89 در سال 2020 |
شاخص SJR | 1.173 در سال 2019 |
شناسه ISSN | 0263-2373 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2019 |
مدل مفهومی | دارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مهندسی مالی و ریسک، مدیریت استراتژیک، مدیریت کسب و کار |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | مجله مدیریت اروپا – European Management Journal |
دانشگاه | Department of Management and Marketing, Franklin P. Perdue School of Business. Salisbury University, MD, 21801, USA |
کلمات کلیدی | زنجیره تامین جهانی، استراتژی، شیوه های اکتشاف، شیوه های بهره برداری، مدیریت ریسک شبکه، عملکرد مالی شرکت |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Global Supply Chain; Strategy; Exploration practices; Exploitation practices; Network Risk Management; Firm Financial Performance |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.03.003 |
کد محصول | E14617 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Literature review 3. Research model and hypotheses development 4. Methodology 5. Analysis of results 6. Discussion of the findings 7. Conclusion: implications and limitations Appendix A. Supplementary data Appendix A. Survey Instrument Uncited references Research Data References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
Increasingly, creating and delivering value through complex supply chain networks involves substantial risks. However, strategy development under business risk conditions is not wellunderstood. This cross-country research examines how, under conditions of supply chain network risk, firms develop effective risk management practices. Using a literature review and survey research of managers from global firms; we present a research model, and empirically test the hypothesized relationships. The results show that under conditions of uncertainty, management decision-making is more likely to be cautious until visible forms of risks emerge, and prudent response mechanisms are put in place. This study identifies the crucial role of supply chain exploration and exploitation practices, and their influence in development of network risk management practices, leading to competitive financial outcomes. Introduction As firms expand their operations globally, they have to sustain their market successes despite supply chain risks. Complex global supply chain networks increase the possibility of a negative impact of potential supply chain disruptions on firm performance. Of particular concern is the role played by suppliers and how small failures at their end may magnify supply chain risk factors for the buyer firm (Kim, Wagner, & Colicchia, 2019; MacKenzie, Barker, & Santos, 2014). Although assuring a total risk-free supply chain is almost impossible, organizations still can develop a resilient supply chain network that recovers from shocks faster than competitors (Brandon-Jones, Squire, Autry, & Petersen, 2014; Hohenstein, Feisel, Hartmann, & Giunipero, 2015). Therefore, in recent years researchers have increasingly paid attention to how firms can develop supply chain risk resilience (Eckerd & Girth, 2017; Singh & Singh, 2019). In focus particularly has been the role of senior management in identifying risks in advance, and implementing the right responses at both firm and network levels (Wieland, 2013). However, despite vigorous research in risk management, much still remains unclear about how firms identify potential supply chain risk events, and consequently develop effective response mechanisms (Kilubi, 2016; Kurniawan, Zailani, Iranmanesh, & Rajagopal, 2017). |