مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد بازاریابی مدرسه و تقسیم بندی – الزویر ۲۰۱۸
مشخصات مقاله | |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۸ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
منتشر شده در | نشریه الزویر |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | School marketing and segmentation: A comparative study in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | بازاریابی مدرسه و تقسیم بندی: مطالعه مقایسه ای در بلغارستان و جمهوری چک |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت، علوم تربیتی |
گرایش های مرتبط | بازاریابی، مدیریت آموزشی |
مجله | مجله بین المللی تحقیقات آموزشی – International Journal of Educational Research |
دانشگاه | Bordeaux University – France |
کلمات کلیدی | نیازهای آموزشی ویژه، آموزش تطبیقی، بازاریابی مدرسه، تقسیم بندی، نابرابری |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Special educational needs, Comparative education, School marketing, Segmentation, Inequality |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.05.004 |
کد محصول | E8359 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
۱٫ Introduction
The paper describes the processes and marketing strategies of education in a post- communist and liberal transition context in the Czech Republic and Bulgaria. Its objective is also to describe the main consequences of the growth of school marketing, which is exponential but not regulated in these two post transition countries. These processes lead, indeed, to an accentuation of segregationist and hyper-bureaucratic educational practices (Maroy, 2010): they are based on the new logic of performance in a hyper competitive educational context (Ball, 2003, 2004) and have a strong impact on renewed school segmentation and inequalities. So, our work contributes to research on this typical phenomenon, linked to a neoliberal and globalized rhetoric of education (Oplatka & Hemsley-Brown, 2012; Torres, 2009). Its specificity is the analysis of the post-communist context which is significant because of the heavy and sustainable impact of the totalitarian and bureaucratic past on education but also because of the reluctance of the social actors to analyze their history (Mayer, 2004). The development of the school market in this context is problematic because by blocking educational innovation and the regulating action of the social actors (Ball & Maroy, 2009; Oplatka, Hemsley-Brown, & Foskett, 2002), it prevents the analysis of the links between the global constraints and the local needs inherited from the past. This is seen in both post totalitarian countries compared, renowned for their efforts to get involved in the European educational globalization, for their discrimination against pupils of diverse backgrounds and for their rather unequal school systems in the pre-communist period. Any concrete educational situation is tightly linked to the specific context in which it occurs. Specific contexts at national, regional and local levels (social background, history, politics, culture and economics) are to be included when we try to ‘export’ educational or training models and concepts to other countries. This is the price of real success and efficiency to improve educational performance at each national level but also at the European level. Hence it is necessary, prior to presenting the research itself, to inform readers about the context in which these survey data were obtained. |