مشخصات مقاله | |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2017 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 23 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
منتشر شده در | نشریه امرالد |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Structuring servitization-related research |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | تحقیق مربوط به ساختار خدمات رسانی در ارائه محصول |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | بازاریابی |
مجله | مجله بین المللی مدیریت عملیات و تولید – International Journal of Operations & Production Management |
دانشگاه | Department of Management – University of Vaasa – Finland |
کلمات کلیدی | Servitization، انفوزیون خدمات، تجزیه و تحلیل کتابشناختی، راه حل های یکپارچه، سیستم های محصولات محصول، انتقال خدمات |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Servitization, Service infusion, Bibliometric analysis, Integrated solutions, Product-service systems, Service transition |
کد محصول | E6006 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
1. Introduction
Born in the late 1980s, research on product-service integration took off in the mid-2000s after the publication of many foundational articles (Brax, 2005; Davies, 2004; Gebauer et al., 2005; Mathieu, 2001a, b; Mont, 2002; Oliva and Kallenberg, 2003; Tukker, 2004). Introduced by Vandermerwe and Rada (1988), the term “servitization” gained popularity after two reviews by Baines et al. (2007) and Baines, Lightfoot, Benedettini and Kay (2009). In the following years, servitization became nearly synonymous with companies moving from selling products and basic services to selling product-service systems (PSS). These PSS typically include advanced lifecycle services and involve changes in companies’ business models (Durugbo, 2013; Rabetino et al., 2015). Evidence demonstrates that some iconic manufacturers across industries, such as Caterpillar, IBM, and Rolls-Royce, have escaped the product commoditization trap and increasingly garnered benefits from their shift to services (Huikkola et al., 2016). This strategic shift has inspired a growing number of publications providing knowledge and avenues for future research. Knowledge has accumulated within related scholarly communities (Lightfoot et al., 2013), i.e. groups of scholars who “are linked by shared interest in distinct yet related problems in the same research area” (Vogel, 2012, pp. 1018-1019). Researchers from the above communities have adopted different perspectives. In addition to the industrial marketing-led and service operations management-led servitization research (the mainstream), Kamp and Parry (2017, p. 12) recognize other “aligned research communities” that “refer to servitization-related concepts without using the term itself.” In this fast-growing domain (Kowalkowski, Gebauer and Oliva, 2017), the coexistence of multidisciplinary viewpoints, methods, and terminologies has increased complexity, which limits knowledge accumulation (Geum and Park, 2011; Pawar et al., 2009; Tukker, 2015). Although meticulous review efforts already exist (Baines et al., 2007; Baines, Lightfoot, Benedettini and Kay, 2009; Boehm and Thomas, 2013; Brax and Visintin, 2017; Luoto et al., 2017; Velamuri et al., 2011), the inclusion of a limited number of articles and the use of different strategies to organize conceptual contributions hinder the integration of the results. Thus, there is a need to create an accurate understanding to permit better integration and a deeper analysis of the interactions among adjacent but detached research communities (Cavalieri and Pezzotta, 2012; Boehm and Thomas, 2013; Lightfoot et al., 2013). |