مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد وضعیت پژوهش دوجانبه: یک رویکرد داده کاوی – امرالد 2017

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال 2017
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی 45 صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه امرالد
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله The state of ambidexterity research: a data mining approach
ترجمه عنوان مقاله وضعیت پژوهش دوجانبه: یک رویکرد داده کاوی
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط مدیریت استراتژیک
مجله مجله بین المللی تحلیل سازمانی – International Journal of Organizational Analysis
دانشگاه Indian Institute of Management Ranchi Ranchi India
کلمات کلیدی دو جانبه، داده/متنی کاوی، بررسی ادبیات، تم ها، وضعیت کنونی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Ambidexterity, Data/Text mining, literature review, themes, current state
کد محصول E7503
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
1. Introduction

Many authors in the fields of strategic management, organizational design and behavior have suggested that long-term organization performance depends on the organization’s ability to exploit current capabilities and explore new opportunities (March, 1991; Raisch et al., 2009). Organizational ambidexterity refers to ‘an organization’s ability to be aligned and efficient in its management of today’s business demands while simultaneously being adaptive to changes in the environment’ (Raisch & Birkinshaw, 2008). Various conceptualizations of ambidexterity have pointed at the tension between exploitation and exploration. March (1991) refers to exploration as activities like ‘search, variation, risk taking, experimentation, play, flexibility, discovery, innovation’ while exploitation refers to activities like ‘refinement, choice, production, efficiency, selection, implementation, execution’. The academic field of ambidexterity has received considerable attention in the last two decades with established forms of Structural (Tushman & O’Reilly, 1996), Contextual (Gibson and Birkinshaw, 2004) and Temporal/Punctuated Equilibrium (Tushman & Romanelli, 1985), which focus on the separation between exploration and exploitation across structures, context and time respectively. Organizational ambidexterity literature has seen impressive growth and a wide variety of applications in various fields such as technological innovation and product design (Gupta, Smith and Shalley, 2006; Andriopoulos and Lewis, 2010) using mostly the firm/business unit (Gibson & Birkinshaw, 2004) as the level of analysis. However, there is an increasing corpus of papers that explore ambidexterity at the individuals/teams level of analysis (Kauppila & Tempelaar, 2016; Mom, Van Den Bosch, & Volberda, 2007). Many authors have asked for more consolidation as well as clarity on the boundaries and scope of ambidexterity. However, these scholars have also pointed at the lack of multi-level works in ambidexterity leading to the absence of an overarching theory of the field (Simsek, 2009; Birkinshaw and Gupta, 2013). Birkinshaw & Gupta (2013) suggest the field could either lead to focus or decline in the coming years. Other scholars in the field of ambidexterity have pointed at unexplored areas of research like the interaction of leadership (O’Reilly and Tushman, 2013) and business model innovation (Markides, 2013) with ambidexterity in organizations.

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *

دکمه بازگشت به بالا