مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | مشارکت در ساخت آینده: چارچوبی برای سنتزپژوهی در کارآفرینی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Creating the Future Together: Toward a Framework for Research Synthesis in Entrepreneurship |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2017 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 29 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه Sage |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
5.073 در سال 2017 |
شاخص H_index | 107 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 3.648 در سال 2017 |
شناسه ISSN | 1042-2587 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2017 |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | کارآفرینی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice |
دانشگاه | Faculty of Economics & Business Administration, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12092 |
کد محصول | E11825 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Introduction Broadly defined, entrepreneurship involves efforts to bring about new economic, social, institutional, or cultural environments (Rindova, Barry, & Ketchen, 2009). Since Schumpeter’s (1911, 1942) pioneering work, entrepreneurship has become widely acknowledged as the key driver of the market economy. Yet, entrepreneurship research as a scholarly discipline is relatively young, and several attempts toward developing a coherent entrepreneurship “research paradigm” have been made (e.g., Davidsson, 2003; Katz & Gartner, 1988; Sarasvathy, 2001; Shane, 2003; Shane & Venkataraman, 2000; Stevenson & Jarillo, 1990). In this respect, the landscape of entrepreneurship research is still to a large extent multiparadigmatic in nature, including fundamentally different perspectives on what entrepreneurship is, how entrepreneurial opportunities are formed, what determines the performance of new ventures, and so forth (Ireland, Webb, & Coombs, 2005; Leitch, Hill, & Harrison, 2010; Zahra & Wright, 2011). This results in widespread confusion and frustration among entrepreneurship researchers regarding the lack of convergence toward a single paradigm and the continuing lack of definitional clarity (Davidsson, 2008; Ireland et al., 2005). Shane’s (2012) and Venkataraman, Sarasvathy, Dew, and Forster’s (2012) reflections on the 2010 Academy of Management Review decade award for their article “The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research” (Shane & Venkataraman, 2000), as well as the subsequent debate, illustrate the disagreement on key paradigmatic issues among prominent entrepreneurship researchers. These differences are not only academic in nature, but also have profound practical implications. For instance, the narrative–constructivist notion of transformation implies that entrepreneurs should focus on acting and experimenting rather than trying to predict the future, as they cannot acquire valid knowledge about uncertain and partly unknowable environments (e.g., Sarasvathy, 2001; Venkataraman et al., 2012). By contrast, other researchers advocate that entrepreneurs should predict carefully, using comprehensive analysis and systematic procedures, before engaging in entrepreneurial activities (e.g., Delmar & Shane, 2003). |