مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | یک رویکرد کنترل یکپارچه ضربان قلب برای چرخه ارگومتر و تمرین تردمیل |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | A unified heart rate control approach for cycle ergometer and treadmill exercise |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 8 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
3.830 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 51 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 0.711 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 1746-8094 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q2 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | تربیت بدنی، پزشکی |
گرایش های مرتبط | قلب و عروق، فیزیولوژی ورزشی، فیزیولوژی فعالیت بدنی و تندرستی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | پردازش و کنترل سیگنال پزشکی – Biomedical Signal Processing And Control |
دانشگاه | Institute for Rehabilitation and Performance Technology, Division of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Engineering and Information Technology, Bern University of Applied Sciences, CH-3400 Burgdorf, Switzerland |
کلمات کلیدی | پویایی ضربان قلب، شناسایی سیستم، كنترل ضربان قلب، كنترل فیزیولوژیك، تردمیل، چرخه ارگومتر |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Heart rate dynamics، System identification، Heart rate control، Physiological control، Treadmills، Cycle ergometers |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101601 |
کد محصول | E12959 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
1- Introduction 2- Methods 3- Results 4- Discussion References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Objective: To develop a unified heart rate (HR) control approach for cycle ergometer (CE) and treadmill (TM) exercise, and to empirically compare the common controller’s performance between the CE and TM. Methods: The control method used frequency-domain shaping ofthe input-sensitivity function to address rejection of disturbances arising from broad-spectrum heart rate variability (HRV). A single controller was calculated using an approximate, nominal linear plant model and an input-sensitivity bandwidth specification. FiftyHRcontroltests were executedusing the single controller:25healthymaleparticipants each did one test on the CE and one on the TM. Results: There was no significant difference in mean root-mean-square HR tracking error: 3.10 bpm ± 0.68 bpm and 2.85 bpm ± 0.75 bpm (mean ± standard deviation, bpm = beats/min); CE vs. TM; p = 0.13. But mean normalised average control signal power was significantly different: 1.59 bpm2 ± 0.27 bpm2 vs. 1.36 bpm2 ± 0.28 bpm2; CE vs. TM; p = 3.5 × 10−4. Conclusion and significance: The lower values for RMS tracking error and control signal power for the TM point to decreasing HRV intensity with increasing HR, because, in order to match perceived exertion for the two modalities, mean HR for the TM was set 20 bpm higher than for the CE. These HR-intensitydependent differences in HRV are consistent with previous observations in the literature. The unified HR control approach for CE and TM exercise gave accurate, stable and robust performance in all tests, thus lending support to the concept that HRV disturbance rejection is the main issue in HR control design. Introduction Feedback systems for automatic control of heart rate (HR) have been developed separately for cycle ergometers [1–3] and treadmills [4–6]. Heart rate controllers are important because they allow accurate implementation of arbitrary HR profiles, such as are employed as part of cardiovascular training programmes [7,8]; recommended strategies include high-intensity interval training (HIIT), where intensity is varied by flexibly combining exercise periods of different durations and at different levels of heart rate [9,10]. In the present work, we set out to develop and test a novel, unified heart rate control approach that can be applied to both cycle ergometers (CE) and treadmills (TM). This undertaking was motivated by the recent observation thatthe time constant of heart-rate dynamics at moderate-to-vigorous (“somewhat hard”) exercise intensities is not significantly different for the cycle ergometer and the treadmill [11]. |