مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد توسعه سیستم خبره پوششی – امرالد ۲۰۱۷
مشخصات مقاله | |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۱۷ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۳۱ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
منتشر شده در | نشریه امرالد |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Wearable Expert System Development: Definitions, Models and Challenges for the Future |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | توسعه سیستم خبره پوششی: تعاریف، مدل ها و چالش هایی برای آینده |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مهندسی کامپیوتر، فناوری اطلاعات |
گرایش های مرتبط | هوش مصنوعی ، مهندسی نرم افزار، شبکه های کامپیوتری |
مجله | برنامه – Program |
دانشگاه | Department of Computer Science – University of Milan – Italy |
کلمات کلیدی | سیستم خبره پوششی، سیستم های مبتنی بر دانش، دستگاه های پوششی، تنگنای کسب دانش، دانش مصنوعی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | : Wearable Expert System, Knowledge-Based Systems, Wearable devices, Knowledge Acquisition Bottleneck, Knowledge Artifact |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi | https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-09-2016-0061 |
کد محصول | E8052 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
۱ Introduction
The terms wearable technology, wearable devices, and wearables all refer to electronic technologies or computers that are incorporated into items of clothing and accessories which can be worn comfortably on the body. Wearable technology usually provides sensory and scanning features not typically seen in mobile and laptop devices, such as biofeedback and tracking of physiological function. Thus, they could be profitably used in a number of applications, being important sources of data for reasoning. In particular wearables could be exploited in the design and implementation of a new breed of expert systems. An expert system is a computer system that emulates the decision-making ability of a human expert (Jackson, 1998). Expert systems are designed to solve complex problems by reasoning about knowledge, represented primarily as if-then rules rather than through conventional procedural code. A generic rule-based system consists of an inference engine and a knowledge base made of rules and facts to be analyzed. In the Knowledge Engineering (KE) field, expert systems development has been always conceived as an offline process, characterized by intense Knowledge Acquisition and Representation phases, conducted by the knowledge engineer in order to make explicit the knowledge involved in a decision making process, which is tacitly owned by human experts. This is not a simple task: as a matter of fact, the knowledge acquisition bottleneck (KAB) is a well-known and still unresolved problem (Gaines, 2013). This paper deals with development of wearable expert systems (WES). A WES is an expert system designed and implemented to obtain input from and give outputs to wearable devices. To interact with wearables, an expert system should be able to recognize how new data coming from them should be interpreted, in dynamically evolving scenarios. We assume that a WES features the following distinguishing characteristics with respect to traditional expert systems: – agile development cycle; – scalable and time-evolving knowledge bases; – interaction with a centralized, possibly cloud-based, knowledge maintenance system based on the knowledge artifact notion. Agility principles can be a starting point to solve the KAB problem, given that traditional expert systems development is not agile by definition, due to the need for three distinct roles: the user, the domain expert and the knowledge engineer. WES development, instead, will be centered on domain experts and users cooperating directly in the system development process, evaluating its effectiveness on the field and modifying and updating it quickly when necessary. Here we find the typical features of agile system development: the focus on incorporating user requirement changes during the project life-cycle (Lee and Xia, 2010) as well as rapidly creating and embracing changes, learning from them (Conboy, 2009). |