مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد پذیرش نوآوری های حسابداری مدیریت – الزویر ۲۰۱۸

مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد پذیرش نوآوری های حسابداری مدیریت – الزویر ۲۰۱۸

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله پذیرش نوآوری های حسابداری مدیریت: سازگاری فرهنگ سازمانی و نتایج درک شده
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Adoption of management accounting innovations: Organizational culture compatibility and perceived outcomes
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۱۶ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه الزویر
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس میباشد
نمایه (index) scopus – master journals – JCR
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
۳٫۸۰۰ در سال ۲۰۱۷
شاخص H_index ۷۲ در سال ۲۰۱۸
شاخص SJR ۱٫۴۲۶ در سال ۲۰۱۸
رشته های مرتبط مدیریت، حسابداری
گرایش های مرتبط حسابداری مدیریت، نوآوری تکنولوژی و مدیریت منابع انسانی
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله / کنفرانس تحقیقات حسابداری مدیریت – Management Accounting Research
دانشگاه University of Gothenburg – School of Business – Economics and Law – Sweden
کلمات کلیدی نوآوری های حسابداری مدیریت، انتشار، اتخاذ، فرهنگ سازمانی، کارت امتیازی متوازن، نظریه جدید نهادی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Management accounting innovations, Diffusion, Adoption, Organizational culture, Balanced scorecard, New-institutional theory
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.07.007
کد محصول E10172
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract
Keywords
۱ Introduction
۲ Theory and development of hypotheses
۳ Method
۴ Results
۵ Discussion
Acknowledgements
Appendix A. Survey questions on cultural positions. (Translated from Swedish.)
Appendix B.
References

بخشی از متن مقاله:
abstract

Although the introduction of a number of successful management accounting innovations over the past few decades has generated a vast amount of research, we have limited knowledge about how the diffusion of innovations is affected by the interplay between characteristics of adopters and characteristics of innovations. The study presented in this paper contributes to the literature that examines the adoption of innovations at the firm level of analysis. We develop and test an adoption model which draws on two recently introduced ideas aboutinnovation adoption—the notion of compatibility between organizational culture and the values and beliefs embedded in innovations, and the perspective that early and late adopters might both be motivated to adopt based on expected economic and social gains and losses. In synthesising these models, we assume that a diffusing innovation that is compatible with a firm’s values and beliefs is adopted early if it is perceived as delivering adequate gains while the innovation is rejected if it is not perceived as doing so, and that a diffusing innovation that is incompatible with a firm’s values and beliefs is adopted late if it is perceived as reducing the likelihood of incurring losses while the innovation is rejected if it is perceived as not doing so. Hypotheses are generated and tested using data provided by a web-based survey of Swedish manufacturing firms on the diffusion of the balanced scorecard across those firms. In most respects, the pattern of results this study finds supports our model and assumptions.

Introduction

Research on the supply and demand of administrative innovations has emerged as fundamental in many fields. The introduction of management accounting innovations (MAIs), such as activitybased costing, the balanced scorecard, strategic management accounting, target costing, and the beyond budgeting approach, has produced an impressive body of research (e.g. Ansari et al., 2007; Gosselin, 2007; Langfield-Smith, 2008; Zawawi and Hoque, 2010; Hoque, 2014). The prevailing focus of such research has been on identifying general contextual factors and firm characteristics that influence the adoption of innovations at the firm level (e.g. Cadez and Guilding, 2008; Abdel-Kader and Luther, 2008; Baird et al., 2004; Brown et al., 2004). Another research direction draws on the new-institutional perspective on diffusion (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983; Tolbert and Zucker, 1983). Management accounting researchers have typically used the management fashion variant of new-institutional theory (Abrahamson, 1991, 1996; Abrahamson and Fairchild, 1999; Abrahamson and Rosenkopf, 1993). Studies have reported how MAI adoption motivations vary through successive phases of the diffusion trajectory (Malmi, 1999, 2001; Malmi and Ikäheimo, 2003). Recent decades have, however, witnessed the emergence of a debate about the application of new-institutional theory in the area of diffusion (e.g. Staw and Epstein, 2000; Lounsbury, 2008; Colyvas and Jonsson, 2011; Chandler, 2014). The influential twostage model of diffusion (Tolbert and Zucker, 1983) has been criticized for oversimplifying behaviour in organizations because it ignores the fact that economic logic is institutionally determined (Lounsbury, 2007) and because it makes unrealistic assumptions about management, whereby “early adopters are motivated by technical considerations and later adopters engage in mindless imitation fuelled by anxiety-driven pressures to conform” (Lounsbury, 2008). Recently, two models that were designed to overcome some of the problems with new-institutional theory have been introduced in the literature.

ثبت دیدگاه