مشخصات مقاله | |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 5 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
منتشر شده در | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله | مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Dual diagnosis competencies: A systematic review of staff training literature |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | صلاحیت تشخیص دوگانه: بررسی سیستماتیک ادبیات آموزش کارکنان |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت منابع انسانی |
مجله | گزارشات رفتارهای اعتیاد آور – Addictive Behaviors Reports |
دانشگاه | Mental Health Service – St Vincent’s Hospital – Melbourne – Australia |
کلمات کلیدی | سلامت روان، تشخیص دوگانه، مصرف مواد، بررسی ادبیات سیستماتیک، دلایل استفاده از مقیاس |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Mental health, Dual diagnosis, Substance use, Systematic literature review, Reasons for use scale |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2018.01.003 |
کد محصول | E8872 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
1. Introduction
It is estimated that anywhere between 40 and 80% of service users who experience mental illness in Victoria, Australia also have issues with substance use. People who suffer from mental health disorders that are complicated by alcohol and or other drug use disorders are defined as having a dual diagnosis (Department of Human Services, 2010). Living with a dual diagnosis can cause complex physical, psychological and social difficulties for a wide range of people (Roberts & Jones, 2012, p.664). Dual diagnosis is typically associated with negative consequences and widely affects many of life’s domains. Research suggests that those with a dual diagnosis compared to those with a single disorder experience much higher rates of violent behaviour, suicidal ideation, suicide and physical health problems (Thornton et al., 2012 p.429). In addition to these complications, there are compounding impacts on a person’s social circumstance including loss of support networks, stress on family and anti-social behaviour. This can lead to possible homelessness and incarceration (Donald, Dower, & Kavanagh, 2005 p.1372). On a more positive note there is literature to suggest that outcomes for service users with dual diagnosis can be enhanced when services provide integrated evidence-based treatment (Drake et al., 2015). There is little research on the role of supervision among those with dual diagnosis training however the minimal evidence suggests that it is necessary. Supervision led by qualified and competent staff in a helping environment has found to support staff in difficult situations and allow the opportunity to reflect on the process that is happening (Cookson, Sloan, Dafters, & Jahoda, 2014). The need for dual diagnosis training to be standardised within the mental health and alcohol and other drug fields across agencies and different discipline occupations has been raised in order to ensure that care is more service-user-oriented (Hughes, 2011). 1.1. Aims and objectives of the study To investigate the extent and quality of staff training innovations in the dual diagnosis field, aiming to enhance staff skills to work with people experiencing severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) comorbid with substance abuse. |