| مشخصات مقاله | |
| ترجمه عنوان مقاله |
راهکارهای جراحی استفاده شده برای اصلاح قوز شوئرمان: یک فرا تحلیل |
| عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Surgical Procedures Used for Correction of Scheuermann’s Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis |
| انتشار | مقاله سال 2021 |
| تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | صفحه 9 |
| هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
| پایگاه داده | نشریه هینداوی |
| نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله مروری (Review Article) |
| مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
| نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR – DOAJ – Medline |
| نوع مقاله | ISI |
| فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
| ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
3.037 در سال 2020 |
| شاخص H_index | 56 در سال 2020 |
| شاخص SJR | 0.702 در سال 2020 |
| شناسه ISSN | 1203-6765 |
| شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q2 در سال 2020 |
| فرضیه | ندارد |
| مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
| پرسشنامه | ندارد |
| متغیر | ندارد |
| رفرنس | دارد |
| رشته های مرتبط | پزشکی |
| گرایش های مرتبط | مغز و اعصاب، جراحی ارتوپدی یا استخوان پزشکی |
| نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
| مجله / کنفرانس | تحقیقات و مدیریت درد – Pain Research and Management |
| دانشگاه | Handan Central Hospital of Hebei Province, Handan, China |
| شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2142964 |
| کد محصول | E16045 |
| وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
| دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
| سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
| فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
| Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion References |
| بخشی از متن مقاله: |
| Introduction Scheuermann’s kyphosis (SK) is a rigid developmental thoracic kyphosis, which can cause severe back pain and cosmetic disorders to patients [1, 2]. Although conservative treatment measures are initially applied, surgical treatment is indicated for kyphosis that is over 70–75 degrees, with significant pain that has not responded to conservative management, and/or respiratory problems due to severe kyphosis, and neurological issues [3–5]. *e surgical treatment consists of two different ways; one is the combined anterior-posterior approach (AP) and the other is a posterior-only way (PO), with various types of anchors [6, 7]. However, previous studies on surgical procedure selection for correction of SK have drawn contradictory conclusions. It was reported that a sufficient correction can be achieved by the PO approach, but the AP approach was more likely to get into a satisfying correction [8]. By contrast, a comparative study reported that the PO approach was more successful with a lower incidence of complications, as compared to the AP approach [9]. Interestingly, Koller et al. [10] found that both approaches achieved similar degrees of correction with higher fusion level in the PO group, after comparing the AP with PO procedures in correcting kyphosis. Considering the controversy stated above, in this study, a meta-analysis was performed in order to figure out a better way between AP and PO procedures in treating SK patients. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Ethical Statement. *e ethical approval was waived because all analyses were based on previously published studies. |