| مشخصات مقاله | |
| ترجمه عنوان مقاله | جوانان غیر افشاگر: یک مطالعه مقطعی برای درک اینکه چرا جوانان افکار خودکشی را برای متخصص سلامت روان خود افشا نمی کنند. |
| عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Non-disclosing youth: a cross sectional study to understand why young people do not disclose suicidal thoughts to their mental health professional |
| انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۲۲ |
| تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۱۱ صفحه |
| هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
| پایگاه داده | نشریه اسپرینگر |
| نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
| مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
| نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR – Medline |
| نوع مقاله | ISI |
| فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
| ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
۳٫۶۳۰ در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
| شاخص H_index | ۹۷ در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
| شاخص SJR | ۱٫۴۳۷ در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
| شناسه ISSN | ۱۴۷۱-۲۴۴X |
| شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
| فرضیه | ندارد |
| مدل مفهومی | دارد |
| پرسشنامه | ندارد |
| متغیر | ندارد |
| رفرنس | دارد |
| رشته های مرتبط | پزشکی، روانشناسی |
| گرایش های مرتبط | روانپزشکی، روانشناسی بالینی |
| نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
| مجله / کنفرانس | روانپزشکی بی ام سی – BMC Psychiatry |
| دانشگاه | Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Australia |
| کلمات کلیدی | پیشگیری از خودکشی، خودکشی جوانان، افشاگری، متخصصان بهداشت روان |
| کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Suicide prevention, youth suicide, disclosure, mental health professionals |
| شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03636-x |
| کد محصول | E16100 |
| وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
| دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
| سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
| فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
| Abstract Background Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References |
| بخشی از متن مقاله: |
| Abstract Background: Prevalence of suicidal ideation increases rapidly in adolescence, and many choose not to seek help and disclose their ideation. Young people who do disclose suicidal ideation, prefer to do so with peers and family compared to mental health professionals, who are best placed to provide evidence-based treatment. This study aimed to identify key factors associated with young people’s decision to, or not to disclose suicidal thoughts to their mental health practitioner. Methods: A community-based sample of young Australians (16 – 25 years), who had experienced suicidal ideation and engaged with a mental health professional, completed an online questionnaire (N=513) which assessed demographic characteristics, severity of depression, anxiety, psychological distress, and suicidal ideation, lifetime suicide attempts, exposure to suicide loss, personal suicide stigma, prioritisation of mental health issues, and therapeutic alliance. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with disclosure. Results: Though the full sample had engaged in therapy, 39% had never disclosed suicidal ideation to their clinician. Those who had disclosed were more likely to report greater therapeutic alliance (OR=1.04, 95% CI=1.02–۱٫۰۶), personal suicide stigma (OR=1.04, 95% CI=1.01–۱٫۰۶), prioritisation of suicidal ideation (OR=.24, 95% CI=0.14-0.42), and lifetime history of suicide attempt (OR=.32, 95% CI=0.18-0.57). The most common reason for not disclosing was concern that it would not remain confdential. Conclusion: These fndings provide new insights into why young people may not seek help by disclosing suicidal ideation, despite having access to a mental health professional, and establish evidence to inform practice decisions and the development of prevention strategies to support young people for suicide. Background Youth suicide prevention is a global priority as intentional self-harm is one of the leading causes of death amongst youth [1]. Suicidal ideation is an important target for youth suicide prevention eforts, with evidence that ideation increases the risk of a future suicide attempt in around one-third of young people [2]. Furthermore, suicidal ideation is one of the most common behaviours on the spectrum of suicidality, afecting around 15 to 29% of adolescents and young adults [3, 4]. Given increasing evidence demonstrating a pathway from ideation to suicide attempt [5, 6], the highprevalence of youth suicidal ideation is a matter of concern. While the best approach to treating suicidal ideation is through traditional therapeutic interventions (e.g., dialectical behavioural therapy and cognitivebehavioural therapy) delivered in clinical settings [7, 8], a number of barriers exist preventing indicated populations from accessing such services. |