مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد اثرات استراتژی محیطی بر عملکرد سازمانی شرکت – الزویر ۲۰۱۸

elsevier

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۱۰ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه الزویر
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting
ترجمه عنوان مقاله اثرات استراتژی محیطی، عدم اطمینان محیط زیست و تعهد مدیریت ارشد بر عملکرد سازمانی شرکت
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط حسابداری و مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط حسابداری مدیریت، حسابداری خدمات عمومی و مدیریت عملکرد
مجله مجله تولید پاک – Journal of Cleaner Production
دانشگاه  Department of Accounting – Indonesia
کلمات کلیدی استراتژی زیست محیطی، عدم اطمینان محیطی درک شده، تعهد بالای مدیریت، حسابداری مدیریت محیط زیست، عملکرد سازمانی شرکت
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Environmental strategy, Perceived environmental uncertainty, Top Management’s commitment, Environmental management accounting, Corporate environmental performance
کد محصول E6502
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
۱٫ Introduction

Environmental accounting is increasingly gaining momentum in the search for sustainable organizations (Christ and Burritt, 2015; Schaltegger and Csutora, 2012; Schaltegger and Lüdeke-Freund, 2013). This is because stakeholders have pressured managers to focus more on environmental issues and environmental performance evaluation (Bennet et al., 2003; Burritt and Schaltegger, 2010; Rodrigue et al., 2013). In order to achieve better corporate environmental management, the implementation of environmental strategies and the use of environmental management accounting (EMA) have been considered key competitive advantages for many companies (Burritt, 2005; Gunarathne and Lee, 2015; Lisi, 2015; Wagner and Schaltegger, 2004). In this work, environmental accounting is understood as the management of monetary, physical and qualitative information on the environmental impacts and the financial consequences of environmentally relevant business activitiesdinformation that supports internal and external decisionmaking, reporting and accountability (Schaltegger et al., 2003). An environmentally friendly organization tends to be dependent on the commitment of top management, which ultimately can result in the achievement of an improved competitive advantage (Spencer et al., 2013; Porter and van der Linde, 1995). The process towards a world-class environmental performance requires the involvement of company resources that includes the commitment of top management, a planning process capable of integrating corporate strategy with environmental issues, and the use of environmental management accounting (EMA). However, to date, the empirical testing of these relationships has not been extensive and has not taken into account the reality of emerging economies, such as Indonesia. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that more research is necessary to understand the Indonesian situation in terms of sustainability-related concepts and practices (Chapple and Moon, 2005). This research is motivated by the lack of empirical evidence currently available on cleaner production about whether or not the use of EMA can improve the environmental performance of companies (Jasch, 2006; Schaltegger et al., 2012). Most of the existing research linking accounting to sustainability has focused on corporate social disclosure (Makel € € a, 2017; Maas et al., 2016; Lodhia and Hess, 2014)and has been more focused on the effects of ecoefficiency on firms’ performance (Burritt and Saka, 2006; Journeault, 2016; Lee, 2012). However, several critical review studies (Derchi et al., 2015; Owen, 2008; Parker, 2011) show that there are a number of persistent gaps in the literature that have not been examined, including the role of the combined resources of the company e such as EMA, top management support, etc. e in boosting corporate greening (Hart and Dowell, 2011).

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *