مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | منابع انسانی مورد نیاز برای تیمهای نظارت ضد میکروبی: گزارش اجماع هلندی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Human resources required for antimicrobial stewardship teams: a Dutch consensus report |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 7 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
بررسی کوتاه (Mini review) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | MedLine – Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
6.169 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 131 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 2.651 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 1198-743X |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت منابع انسانی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | میکروبیولوژی و عفونت بالینی – Clinical Microbiology and Infection |
دانشگاه | Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands |
کلمات کلیدی | نظارت ضد میکروبی، پشتیبانی مالی، منابع انسانی، فعالیتهای نظارتی، هدف نظارت |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Antimicrobial stewardship، Financial support، Human resources، Stewardship activities، Stewardship objective |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.005 |
کد محصول | E12503 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
Introduction Methods and sources Results Discussion References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Scope: Antimicrobial stewardship teams are responsible for implementing antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASP). However, in many countries, lack of funding challenges this obligation. A consensus procedure was performed to investigate which structural activities need to be performed by Dutch stewardship teams and how much time (and thus full-time equivalent (FTE) labor) is needed to perform these activities. Introduction Antimicrobial stewardship may be defined as ‘a coherent set of actions designed to use antimicrobials in ways that ensure sustainable access to effective therapy for all who need them’ [1]. Three dimensions of stewardship can be recognized [2]. Stewardship encompasses firstly structural prerequisites that should be met when implementing an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP), such as the presence of a multidisciplinary antimicrobials stewardship team, ensuring the presence of local practice guidelines or information technology support. Secondly, stewardship objectives describe the recommended care that should be provided at the patient level, such as prescribing empirical antimicrobial therapy according to guidelines and timely switch from intravenous to oral administration [3]. To bridge the gap between recommended care and the actual care provided, many behavioural change interventions can be used by the antimicrobial stewardship team. This third dimension of antimicrobial stewardship, the stewardship improvement interventions, relates to strategies that should be performed for achieving the stewardship objectives [2,3]. Examples include the performance of prospective audit and feedback as well as preauthorization. In Dutch hospitals, antimicrobial stewardship teams, consisting of at least an infectious disease specialist, a medical microbiologist and a hospital pharmacist, are responsible for implementing an ASP. As of 2014, all Dutch hospitals are required to have a stewardship team; the Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate supervises the establishment and performance of stewardship teams. The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB), consisting of representatives of the professional societies involved in stewardship (infectious disease physicians, medical microbiology, hospital pharmacy, intensive care medicine and paediatrics) supports the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in Dutch hospitals on a national level. On the basis of a systematic review and meta-analysis [3], SWAB published a stewardship guideline that includes recommendations on appropriate antimicrobial use to guide the stewardship team’s choice of potential stewardship objectives. In addition to this guideline, SWAB disseminated the ‘Antimicrobial Stewardship Practice Guide for the Netherlands’ providing practical support on how to embark on antimicrobial (antibiotic, antifungal and antiviral) stewardship. Furthermore, a yearly conference is organized to facilitate the exchange of best practices among stewardship teams [4]. |