مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | تقویت استراتژی رقابتی بین المللی: اهمیت روابط مدیریتی زمانی که رویکردی استاندارد یا سفارشی در نظر گرفته می شود |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Improving international competitive strategy: The importance of managerial ties when considering a standardized or customized approach |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 4 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه امرالد |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله مروری (Review Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | بازاریابی، مدیریت استراتژیک، مدیریت عملکرد |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | جهت گیری استراتژیک – Strategic Direction |
کلمات کلیدی | عملکرد صادرات، شبکه، نظریه احتمالی، کشورهای در حال توسعه، اتحادیه اروپا، روابط رقابتی بین المللی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Export performance, Networking, Contingency theory, Developing countries, European union, International competitive ties |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-03-2018-0056 |
کد محصول | E10496 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
for any organization engaged internationally, direct affects on performance and competitive advantage are typically simple to identify and address. A response to a direct pressure or threat may come in various forms. A differentiation strategy is used to provide products or services to customers that are perceived as unique and tailored to their needs. A low-cost strategy is used to undercut rivals in pricing and gain a larger market share. When there is no obvious direct market pressure or threat there can be issues relating to how an organization should respond. As such, organizations need to consider contingency theory, in order to know what to do when there is no direct effect on international competitive strategy on export performance. A contingency approach can be useful for an organization in order to generate market theory when there is no direct effect. Of particular interest is what effect managerial ties (MTs), such as business or political ties, have on the international competitive strategy-export performance framework. Chung and Kuo (2018) have identified business and political ties as having conflicting effects on this framework. Business ties, those that involve buyers, suppliers, distributors, and competitors, are seen to have a positive moderation effect on international competitive strategy-performance. Political ties, such as those between an organization’s executives and government officials (political leaders, officials in industry bureaus, or regulatory and supporting organizations) are believed to have a negative effect. Chung and Kuo (2018) have focused on the contingency performance strategy from developing regions (China) to a developed economic setting (EU).or any organization engaged internationally, direct affects on performance and competitive advantage are typically simple to identify and address. A response to a direct pressure or threat may come in various forms. A differentiation strategy is used to provide products or services to customers that are perceived as unique and tailored to their needs. A low-cost strategy is used to undercut rivals in pricing and gain a larger market share. When there is no obvious direct market pressure or threat there can be issues relating to how an organization should respond. As such, organizations need to consider contingency theory, in order to know what to do when there is no direct effect on international competitive strategy on export performance. A contingency approach can be useful for an organization in order to generate market theory when there is no direct effect. Of particular interest is what effect managerial ties (MTs), such as business or political ties, have on the international competitive strategy-export performance framework. Chung and Kuo (2018) have identified business and political ties as having conflicting effects on this framework. Business ties, those that involve buyers, suppliers, distributors, and competitors, are seen to have a positive moderation effect on international competitive strategy-performance. Political ties, such as those between an organization’s executives and government officials (political leaders, officials in industry bureaus, or regulatory and supporting organizations) are believed to have a negative effect. Chung and Kuo (2018) have focused on the contingency performance strategy from developing regions (China) to a developed economic setting (EU). |