مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | آیا نوآوری می تواند اندازه گیری شود؟ یک چارچوب چگونگی اندازه گیری مشارکت نوآوری در شرکت ها |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Can innovation be measured? A framework of how measurement of innovation engages attention in firms |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 12 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.256 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 58 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 0.940 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0923-4748 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | نوآوری تکنولوژی، مدیریت تکنولوژی، مدیریت کسب و کار، مدیریت عملکرد |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | مجله مهندسی و مدیریت تکنولوژی – Journal of Engineering and Technology Management |
دانشگاه | Sten K Johnson Centre for Entrepreneurship, Lund University, Sweden |
کلمات کلیدی | مدیریت نوآوری، اندازه گیری کلیدی عملکرد، اندازه گیری نوآوری، رسیدگی، نظریه مبتنی بر توجه، مدل فرایندی، اکتشاف و بهره برداری، اندازه گیری مکالمه، اندازه گیری جهت دار |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Innovation management، Key performance measurement، Measuring innovation، Attention، Attention based theory، Process model، Exploration and exploitation، Conversational measurement، Directional measurement |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.003 |
کد محصول | E11392 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
1- Introduction 2- Measuring innovation: a literature background 3- Innovation measurement as an attention focusing device 4- A framework for improved measurement of innovation 5- Discussion 6- Conclusion References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Many firms manage the innovation process by using metrics. Yet, whether measurement supports or hinders innovation continues to be a topic of debate. To shed new light on this debate, this paper presents a conceptual framework of how measurement engages attention in firms. We draw on attention based theory and conceptualize innovation measurement as an attention-focusing device. We identify two ideal types of measurement practices. i) Directional Measurement: which is based on few and unidirectional metrics and encourages exploitative innovation efforts. ii) Conversational Measurement: which is based on multiple and ambiguous metrics and encourages exploration. We extend theory building in the technology and accounting literatures by theorizing the role of metrics and measurement for attention and by discussing the implications of such attentional engagement for innovation performance. In so doing, we engage closely with the managerial task of managing innovation while simplifying its conditions, thereby providing actionable advice. Introduction Many firms manage the innovation process by using metrics (Chan et al., 2008). This makes the measurement of innovation an important topic in the technology- and innovation management literature (Richtnér et al., 2017). The extent to which measurement is beneficial for innovation, however, continues to be a topic of debate (Criscuolo et al., 2017; Chiesa, 1999). Even after decades of research, results are mixed. One line of research suggests that measurement can be beneficial to innovation (e.g. Markham and Lee, 2013). Scholars in this stream have argued that measurement help managers to audit structural antecedents, processes and outcomes, thus ensuring that innovation is sufficiently supported and efficiently performed. Another line of research suggests that measurement discourage managers from pursuing more ground-breaking innovation (Criscuolo et al., 2017). Here, studies have shown that innovation measurement obstructs or hinders innovation since it pushes organizational members to focus their attention too narrowly (Abernethy and Brownell, 1997; Amabile et al., 1996; Tushman, 1997). The purpose of this paper is to shed new light on this debate by proposing a framework on how innovation can be measured. Drawing on attention based theory (Ocasio, 1997, 2011) we conceptualize innovation measurement as an attention-focusing device. |