مشخصات مقاله | |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 12 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
منتشر شده در | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله | مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Marginalization and invasion of architects’ role on house projects: Institutional intervention inadequacy and super wicked problems |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | حاشیه نشینی و نقش تهاجمی معماران در پروژه های ساختمانی: عدم تکافو مداخله سازمانی و مشکلات بسیار فاسد |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت، مهندسی معماری |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت پروژه، مدیریت سازمان های دولتی |
مجله | مرزهای تحقیق معماری – Frontiers of Architectural Research |
دانشگاه | Department of Building Technology – Kumasi Technical University – Ghana |
کلمات کلیدی | رابطه مشتری-معمار؛ مدیریت معماری؛ پروژه های خانه؛ مشکلات بسیار فاسد؛ محرومیت و تهاجم نقش؛ مداخلات نهادی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Client–architect relationship; Architectural management; House projects; Super wicked problems; Marginalization and role invasion; Institutional interventions |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2018.04.001 |
کد محصول | E8689 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
1. Introduction
The successful design and construction of houses require complex interactions between clients and professional service providers, such as architects, engineers, planners, and contractors (Lapidus, 1967; Siva and London, 2012). Despite the importance of each of these project actors, the architect has, for decades, traditionally played the role of master builder and head of the design team and is responsible for managing the project and the activities of different actors (Cuff, 1991; London et al., 2005). Essentially, the architect has been perceived as the “spiritual leader” of the project (Royal Institute of British Architects [RIBA], 2015a). In the modern construction industry, however, this role is no longer “the exclusive domain of architects. Other disciplines have gradually encroached on the architect’s core activities” (van Gulijk, 2009, p. 10). The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) (2011) reported that architects, especially “small general practices” and individual architects “working for private clients with local builders” are facing an invasion of their traditional role from “nonarchitect[s]” such as contractors and draftsmen. Evidence suggests that clients are unwilling to fully employ architects on projects where they may not be mandatory (Frimpong and Dansoh, 2016; The Guardian, 2017). In response to this trend, architects have repeatedly attempted to remedy this situation at the institutional level. However, research (e.g., Oluwatayo, 2013; Oluwatayo et al., 2014a, 2014b; RIBA, 2005, 2011, 2015a, 2016a) reports different conditions that suggest that architects’ institutional interventions have not been effective in dealing with the marginalization of architects and the invasion of their roles. The Architects’ Journal [AJ] (2017a), for instance, reports that although the profession’s authority has been in decline for a while, it “appears recently to have come to a head.” Against this backdrop, the current work explores the complexity of the problem by asking whether such is a “super wicked problem” (Levin et al., 2012). |