مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد یک ویژگی سیستماتیک بازاریابی سازمانی – الزویر ۲۰۱۸
مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | یک ویژگی سیستماتیک بازاریابی سازمانی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | A systemic characterization of organizational marketing |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۱۰ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | بازاریابی، مدیریت استراتژیک |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
کنفرانس |
مجله / کنفرانس | پروسیدیا – علوم اجتماعی و رفتاری – Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences |
دانشگاه | University Politehnica Timisoara – Romania |
کلمات کلیدی | رویکرد سیستمیک؛ تحلیل سیستمیک؛ ۱۱ عملکرد سازمان؛ پایداری؛ بازاریابی جامع ۹P |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | marketing; systemic approach; systemic analysis; 11 functions of organization; sustainability; holistic marketing mix 9P |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.019 |
کد محصول | E9950 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract ۱ Introduction ۲ Environments, resources/ products and organization functions ۳ Systemic characterization of marketing as complex function of organizations ۴ Conclusions References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
The great diversity of marketing definitions and characterizations is not favorable to the theory and practice of the 21st century management, being, generally, the consequence of a non-systemic approach and analysis of organization/ company functions. The present work aims to contribute to the increase of management and marketing rigor in order to achieve lasting/ sustainable progress in all areas. The methodology of systemic approach and analysis is applied at the level of organization/ company functions, while deepening the “marketing” mixed complex function. Starting from an original model “7 Environments – 7 Resources/ Products”, a systemic model with 11 functions of the organization/ company is being developed, the holistic (systemic) marketing and the related 9P marketing mix are being defined and characterized in a systemic manner, the stages of the lasting/ sustainable competitiveness cycle of holistic marketing is being described. The in-depth study of the content of selfcontained cycles for the lasting/ sustainable competitiveness of organizations/ enterprises is the topics of future research. Applying the results in practice facilitates the organization’s orientation towards lasting/ sustainable progress. Introduction Composed of jobs/ workplaces, organizations/ companies are complex and very complex systems that aim at achieving temporary/ lasting/ sustainable competitiveness in their external environments. Their scientific knowledge (aim and mission, resources, functions, programs, structures, processes, products, performances etc.) has gradually progressed after 1900 (Drucker, 1973, 2008; DuBrin, 2010; Certo & Certo, 2012; Griffin, 2016; Pater & Cristea, 2017), and after 1950, the systemic approach of organizations/ companies and their components has been evident, through concision and precision. Within this framework, in the literature after 1900, two categories of approaches and definitions of marketing concept have developed: (1) many functional definitions, correlated with the views of the authors during the period of their definition (Clark, 1922; Hotchkiss, 1938; Maynard & Beckman, 1939; Bartels, 1962, 1976; Baker, 2003; Blythe, 2005; Kotler & Keller, 2006; Kotler & Caslione, 2009; Dann, 2010; Cohen, 2011; Gamble, 2011; Keelson, 2012; AMA, 2017) and periodically improved (Murphy et al, 2005; Izvercian, 2006; Keller & Kotler, 2006; Grundey & Zaharia, 2008; Kotler, Kartajaya & Setiavan, 2009; Kotler, Kartajaya & Setiavan, 2010; Mitchell, Wooliscroft & Higham, 2010; Gordon, Carrigan & Hastings, 2011; Arseculeratne & Yazdanifard, 2014; Rakic & Rakic, 2015; Sheth & Sisodia, 2015; Garg & Sharma, 2017), (2) some definitions oriented towards the systemic approach (Lazer & Kelley, 1962; Ottman, 1993; Bannon, 2002; Grant, 2007; Polese, 2011), with different points of view, but without being based on a system of concepts about systems (Wilson, 1990; Popa, 2003; Pater & Cristea, 2017). |