مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | به سوی پایداری محصول واقعی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Towards true product sustainability |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2017 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 36 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله مروری (Review article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
5.338 در سال 2017 |
شاخص H_index | 132 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 1.467 در سال 2017 |
شناسه ISSN | 0959-6526 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2017 |
رشته های مرتبط | مهندسی صنایع |
گرایش های مرتبط | تولید صنعتی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | Journal of Cleaner Production |
دانشگاه | Institute for Economy and the Environment (IWÖ-HSG), University of St.Gallen, Tigerbergstr. 2, 9000, St.Gallen, Switzerland |
کلمات کلیدی | پایداری محصول، نوآوری محصول، پایداری تجاری، نوآوری پایدار، توسعه پایدار، مثبت خالص |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Product sustainability, Product innovation, Business sustainability, Sustainability-oriented innovation, Sustainable development, Net positive |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.189 |
کد محصول | E11923 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Outline Highlights Abstract Keywords 1. Introduction 2. Background: the challenges of sustainable development 3. Evolving perspectives of product sustainability 4. Summary and conclusions Abbreviation index References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Product sustainability is usually looked at from a business perspective with the goal to reduce product related risks or to differentiate the product from those of the competition – mostly with limited effects for sustainable development (SD). In light of the global sustainability challenges, we raise the question how products can make a significant contribution to SD? In addressing this question we analyze the evolution of the product sustainability concept over time. This analysis is guided by two questions and it applies two different perspectives. The first question uses an analytical perspective and asks: “How have different product sustainability concepts been framed with regard to their contributions to SD and how have they evolved over time?” The second question uses a normative perspective and asks: “How do the product sustainability concepts in their different developmental phases contribute to SD?” We present a systematic analysis of the evolving perspectives of product sustainability which we group in three different phases and levels of development: from selective to holistic improvements (Product Sustainability 1.0), from better products to good products (Product Sustainability 2), and from private value to public value generation (Product Sustainability 3.0). In this evolution we perceive a development towards a model of “true product sustainability”, where the product makes a specific contribution to solving societal problems. Introduction Product sustainability (PS) looks at how products can provide economic benefits to companies while at the same time providing environmental and social benefits to society in general. Or, in other words, PS aims at balancing the contributions of products to the triple bottom-line, thereby creating multiple and shared values for different stakeholders. There have been a great number of different approaches of how this balance can be achieved and preserved through eco design, design for sustainability, cradle-to-cradle, product service systems or handprinting. While early approaches were focusing on balancing economic and environmental benefits, the discussion later moved on to address sustainability problems in all its dimensions. And while the discussions revolved for long around minimizing the negative impacts of products, more recent approaches have started to focus on positive impacts, thereby aiming for net-positive products. The evolution of these different approaches to PS presents a remarkable development that is rarely perceived. |