مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | درک مفاهیم دراز مدت بازده خرده فروش در روابط تجارت به تجارت |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Understanding the long-term implications of retailer returns in business-to-business relationships |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 21 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه اسپرینگر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
8.488 در سال 2017 |
شاخص H_index | 139 در سال 2018 |
شاخص SJR | 4.614 در سال 2018 |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | بازاریابی، مدیریت کسب و کار، مدیریت عملکرد |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله آکادمی علوم بازاریابی – Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science |
دانشگاه | Malloy Hall – Babson College – USA |
کلمات کلیدی | روابط B2B، فروش، خرده فروشی، بازده، بازاریابی رابطه ای، تبادل اجتماعی، یادگیری و جهت گیری های عملکردی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | B2B relationships, Sales, Retail, Returns, Relationship marketing, Social exchange, Learning and performance orientations |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0553-6 |
کد محصول | E9379 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract Retailer returns Theoretical background Hypothesis development Methodology Measures Measurement model Results References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Providing end consumers with the ability to return products is an important part of a retailer’s service offering. While research in reverse logistics has explored the movement of returned merchandise upstream, little research examines the relational implications of returned merchandise in the businessto-business (B2B) context. This research explores the relational implications, as well as the impact on the supplier salesperson’s behaviors, of retailer returns. Using a comprehensive dataset which includes longitudinal archival returns data, as well as two waves of retailer surveys reporting on salesperson behaviors, our research investigates how retail returns impact salesperson responses in the following time period, retailer perceptions of the relationship in the following time period, and returns in the following time period. Consistent with a reciprocal exchange perspective, results suggest that when salespeople respond to returns by engaging in relationship building behaviors, these behaviors are noted by the retailer, which in turn results in fewer returns in a future time period. Retailer returns Retailer returns are a common element of supplier–retailer relationships. Typically, at the end of a selling season, the supplier agrees to take back the retailer’s unsold merchandise for a refund or a credit toward future orders, something that is typically negotiated a priori. A returns policy shifts the burden of demand uncertainty from the retailer to the supplier and acts as an incentive for retailers to increase stock (Yue and Raghunathan 2007). However, this increases the risk for suppliers since, as noted above, suppliers will generally take back unsold merchandise at the end of the selling period. These retailer returns might occur for a variety of reasons. A dominant cause of retailer returns is due to overstocks, which largely occur due to their being a finite selling period or uncertain demand (Tsay 2001). Surpluses might also occur when a brand, or a competing brand, introduces a new version of a product thus rendering the initial product obsolete. Overstocks are damaging to the retailer as the only way to reduce them is through markdowns (or sales) to increase the sell thru or by returning the merchandise to the vendor. Retailer returns might also occur when a supplier salesperson encourages a retailer to purchase certain quantities, and the sales team at the retailer is not committed to helping sell that product. For example, a sales associate at Best Buy might have an affinity for Samsung products and therefore sells fewer LG products, thus creating a surplus. |