مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد ایجاد ارزش در جوامع آنلاین از طریق نظارت و مشارکت ذینفعان – الزویر 2018

1- Introduction

2- Related literature

3- Context

4- Method

5- Case study

6- Value creation

7- Conclusion

References

Abstract

The spread of the internet has led to the evolution of on-line communities (OCs) as collectives of members who share common goals. Whilst many OCs involve individuals who engage voluntarily for mutual interest, commercial and government organizations engage involuntary stakeholders in their less egalitarian OCs. Although research has explored how members perceive and achieve value in voluntary OCs, exploration of the strategies used to engage stakeholders and deliver value in OCs where the membership is more diverse and less than voluntary, is required. We investigate this issue through a longitudinal case study of two OCs related to delivering government employment services. Our findings demonstrate the role of governance in fostering stakeholders’ cognitive, emotional and behavioral engagement in two OCs, and related governance of the IT system that was subsequently deployed. Further, assessment of the performance outcomes, reported in terms of the primary stakeholder’s objectives, indicates that value has been achieved for the mutual benefit of the OCs’ multiple stakeholders. Analysis of the processes of value creation, in terms of Makadok’s four causal mechanisms for generating profit, show that whilst the key stakeholder preemptively committed timelines, governance mechanisms that generated competition and flexibility (rather than restraining rivalry), and delivered competitive advantage and information asymmetry, produced value for government, service providers, jobseekers and employers.

Introduction

On-line communities (OCs) are open collectives of dispersed members who share common interests or goals, and for whom that community offers some benefit (Barrett et al., 2016; Sproull and Arriaga, 2007). They are increasingly evident in a variety of forms, including: communities of social contact, such as Facebook; communities of knowledge, where members share information such as health; and communities of interest focused on social and environmental issues (Boudreau and Lakhani, 2013; Plant, 2004). As a virtual form of community, OC members are typically voluntary individuals. However, with the spread of the internet, OCs are evolving (Faraj et al., 2011; Plant, 2004) as technology offers increasingly real-time, low-cost transmissions that are more widely accessible. Businesses have recognized the opportunity to engage more directly with external stakeholders (customers, clients or suppliers) and create business value by identifying and delivering upon needs (Barrett et al., 2016). Similarly, governmental institutions are moving beyond a dyadic community of engagement between government departments and out-sourced service providers, using technology (often tailor-made) to more actively engage with constituent clients and explore how to create value for all OC participants. Research into OCs has generated insights about knowledge collaboration (Faraj et al., 2011); building stakeholder attachment (Ren et al., 2012); management of boundaries (Jarvenpaa and Lang, 2011); and social motivations (Wang and Chen, 2012). Yet there is little in the information technology (IT)-related literature about how member engagement with OCs is conceptualized (Ray et al., 2014); nor about how value is created and governed in such OCs (Barrett et al., 2016). Moreover, whilst there has been prior research regarding supply chains and intra-organizational contexts, our context is different in that it presents a more complex relationship between five stakeholder groups (individual and organizational) where the focus of activity relates to employment outcomes rather than discrete economic transactions per se. Our research focusses on understanding how the processes and practices associated with governing two inter-organizational OCs created engagement and value for public and private stakeholders. These OCs relate to the deployment and utilization of two IT-enabled employment services systems, with five stakeholder/member groups – the Australian Government, the government agency responsible for national employment policies and programs, service providers, employers and jobseekers. Rather than simply delivering technology systems, the contributions of members’ knowledge and expertise to development of employment services is fundamental to performance. As such, both employment service systems constitute OCs. Through a longitudinal case study of the Department of Employment’s3 (DOE) development of these employment services, delivered principally through a tailor-made information system (IS) to geographically dispersed service providers and their clients (employers and job seekers), our findings show stakeholders were engaged through careful governance. This fostered their contribution of knowledge to these OCs, with this engagement and knowledge guiding governance of development of the IT system. Evaluation against Makadok’s (2010, 2011) causal mechanisms for profit generation (rivalry restraint, competitive advantage, information asymmetry and commitment timing) show, given the OC context, some unexpected findings. Whilst the DOE, as the key stakeholder, preemptively committed timelines, its governance accommodated the introduction of some competition and flexibility (rather than restraining rivalry), and permitted some competitive advantage and self-developed information asymmetry that generated value for stakeholders (the Australian Government, DOE itself, service providers, jobseekers and employers).