مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | تنوع مذهبی در داخل کشور و عملکرد پروژه های زیربنایی مشارکت خصوصی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Within-country religious diversity and the performance of private participation infrastructure projects |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 13 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journal List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
5.352 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 158 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 1.684 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0148-2963 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | دارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت کسب و کار |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | مجله تحقیقات تجاری – Journal of Business Research |
دانشگاه | Kedge Business School – Department of Management – cours de la Libération – France |
کلمات کلیدی | تنوع مذهبی در داخل کشور، پروژه زیرساخت های مشارکت خصوصی، شرکت چند ملیتی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Within-country religious diversity، Private participation infrastructure project، Multinational enterprise |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.027 |
کد محصول | E10647 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
1- Introduction 2- Literature review and hypotheses 3- Method 4- Results 5- Discussion References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract This paper investigates the impact of within-country religious diversity on the performance of private participation infrastructure projects. Our analysis of 8139 projects in 33 countries (1990–2014) shows that higher levels of within-country religious diversity are associated with a higher risk of project failure. This negative effect is exacerbated in greenfield projects and when a project’s main sponsor is a foreign firm. In contrast, we find no moderation effect for local government ownership. The study contributes to the ongoing debate regarding the effects of within-country diversity on foreign business ventures. Introduction Scholarly interest in within-country diversity has increased in recent years in response to the critique that this type of diversity is ignored in studies of cross-country differences (Shenkar, 2001, 2012; Tung, 2008). Challenging the assumption of within-country homogeneity, recent studies have offered fine-grained insights into the effects of withincountry diversity on foreign-investment decisions and performance (Beugelsdijk, Maseland, Onrust, van Hoorn, & Slangen, 2015; Beugelsdijk, Slangen, Maseland, & Onrust, 2014; Dow, Cuypers, & Ertug, 2016). However, the evidence to date has been mixed. Beugelsdijk et al. (2014) suggest that multinational enterprises (MNEs) are more likely to focus on culturally similar customer segments when within-country diversity is greater. On the other hand, Dow et al. (2016) maintain that within-country religious and linguistic diversity hampers information-gathering efforts in cross-border acquisitions, thereby increasing the potential problems of ex-ante information asymmetries and ex-post behavioral uncertainty. Moreover, while these studies have shown that within-country diversity has an effect on MNE affiliates’ sales and decisions concerning the equity share in crossborder acquisitions, little is known about how within-country diversity affects business ventures in which local and/or foreign firms must work closely together. Our study focuses on religion as one element of within-country diversity that affects local and foreign firm collaborations in the context of private participation infrastructure projects. Religion is a focal point of analysis in several papers that pay special attention to consumer and consumption behavior (Cleveland, Laroche, & Hallab, 2013; Engelland, 2014; Jamal & Sharifuddin, 2015; Minton, Kahle, & Kim, 2015; Montgomery, 2003). However, the extant literature has not considered the effect of religion at the presence of firm foreignness and inter-firm collaboration. Dow et al. (2016) analyzed the impact of religious beliefs on MNEs’ decisions in relation to foreign acquisitions, but not inter-firm collaboration. Beugelsdijk et al. (2014) investigated the latter, but from a point of linguistic differences. Therefore, our study is the first to investigate within-country religious diversity effects in projects consisting of legally independent organizations. |